Case D-155 · AI Sanctions Case Tracker

Erica Whitesock v. Bird Global, Inc., and the City of Austin

District Court of Travis County, Texas (250th Judicial District), June 8, 2026

The case

Erica Whitesock, Individually, and on behalf of Christopher Whitesock, decedent v. Bird Rides, Inc.; Third Lane Mobility, Inc. d/b/a Bird Global, Inc.; and the City of Austin, Cause No. D-1-GN-25-011111, Travis County, Texas, 250th Judicial District (Judge Cory Liu), order granting the City of Austin's plea to the jurisdiction, signed June 8, 2026. Copy of primary document: `~/workspace/goals/ai-sanctions-case-monitoring/files/sources/D-155-whitesock-v-city-of-austin.pdf`.

What happened

Attorney Bradford Klager admitted to the court that a fake quotation of the Texas Tort Claims Act in his response, containing a nonexistent exception to governmental immunity, was completely fabricated by a generative AI chatbot and blindly copied and pasted without checking its veracity. The filing also misrepresented a private-landowner liability statute as a governmental-immunity waiver.

The rule and the sanction

The attorney's duty of candor and reasonable inquiry. Sanctions: Klager and his law firm Hilliard Law jointly and severally liable for $10,000 in the City of Austin's attorney's fees, and Klager ordered to provide a copy of the order to his client.

How it could have been avoided

Never paste AI-generated legal quotations into a filing without checking them against the actual statute or opinion. A hallucinated statute exception on a jurisdictional issue is the worst possible place for an unverified quote.

---