Hodges v. Meridian Waste Acquisitions, LLC
“[L]awyers are ethically bound in all court filings to provide true and accurate record and case citations.”
The court, in Hodges v. Meridian Waste Acquisitions, LLC
The case
Hodges v. Meridian Waste Acquisitions, LLC, Case Nos. 3:25-cv-62 and 5:25-cv-45 (M.D. Fla.), sanctions order following a January 13, 2026 hearing. Primary order: https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025-00062-53-3-cv
What happened
Plaintiff's counsel admittedly filed briefs in two cases containing AI-generated fake citations.
The rule and the sanction
The court reiterated that "lawyers are ethically bound in all court filings to provide true and accurate record and case citations" and that AI as a research tool "does not alter this basic requirement of candor to the tribunal." Upon discovery, counsel took corrective steps: efforts to withdraw the filings, paying defendants $7,000 in fees (3:25-cv-62), reducing his own fees (5:25-cv-45), completing multiple ethics CLEs, arranging CLE for his law firm, alerting the clients involved, and apologizing to the court and defense counsel. As a further sanction, the court required counsel to complete ten speaking engagements to bar associations or law students by January 29, 2027, with a compliance certification (ORDER, pp. 3–4). The court expressly declined to refer counsel to the Middle District Grievance Committee or the Florida Bar (ORDER, p. 3).
How it could have been avoided
Verify before filing; but if prevention fails, this case models the mitigation playbook courts reward: prompt withdrawal, voluntary fee payments, and relevant CLE: the opposite of the denial-and-delay pattern that draws harsher sanctions elsewhere.